Search for: "State v. Jose R."
Results 461 - 480
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 10:37 am
(San Diego Municipal Employees Assn. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:02 am
He has that "right" under a United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz), US: Proposals for the approval of generic biologics under consideration: (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings), US: A paradigm shift in obviousness for pharma, biotech: (IP Law360), US: USPTO’s Bruce Kisliuk addresses ACI Pharma/biotech patent claim drafting and prosecution conference: (Patent Docs), US: New bill to provide biotech companies Sarbanes-Oxley relief: (California Biotech Law Blog), US: Biotech and pharma companies spent millions on lobbying in 2007: (Patent… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Similarly, if someone’s cat does not roam outdoors, it can remain unaltered.SB 250 does not cost the state any money. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
As discussed here, on May 21, 2012, Florida Federal Judge Jose E. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
(S.) v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
Circuit Court in Richmond, VA, split 5-4 on each of the two points in the case, Al-Marri v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Even in the context of prevention of secrecy in government, "the public interest in protecting the privacy of noise complainants and in preventing a chilling effect on complaints, clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure of complainants' names…" City of San Jose v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:50 am
United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm
The Cyrus R. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
In Legislature v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
In Righthaven LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
Writing the judgement, Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes stated that: "We see no reason why a single-color mark in the specific context of the fashion industry could not acquire secondary meaning? [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
September 18, 2007. 104*104 Jose A. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
. --- Stephen Baxter, Community Neighborhoods, February 24, 2010 Airport officials at Mineta San Jose International Airport in California plan to ask the San Jose City Council to change the airport’s master plan and allow for the transformation of more space for private jets. [read post]
