Search for: "State v. K. K. C."
Results 461 - 480
of 2,291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
Campbell, Judge.Representing Appellants: Angela C. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:49 am
C) Who did Judge Murray Klein lose to (tricky question). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
§ 3004(c)(1). [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Having considered the Notice dated December 13, 2011 concerning amended R 71 and new R 71a (OJ EPO 2012, 52) and the draft Guidelines, C-V 4, I tend to believe that the way in which the ED acted here is blameless, even under the new regime. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The values of the average particle sizes ð, ðv, and ðs differ for any particle size distribution (...). [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:20 pm
Authored By: Kimberly K. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
FitzPatrick, Jr.Counsel of Record for James CallahanHeather K. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
In 1950, Curtis C. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:39 am
Utah state Rep. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:27 am
Contents include:International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area, with introductory note by K. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:22 pm
It states that ATS&K may assist him in patent application filing logistics. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Grunert, Scott C. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Lim v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
C. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 4:01 pm
The Guidelines for examination in the EPO (D-V 3.3) contain the statement that “if information is made available by means of a written description and use or by means of a written and oral description, but only the use or the oral description is made available before the relevant date, then in accordance with C-IV, 6.1, the subsequently published written description may be deemed to give a true account of that oral description or use, unless the proprietor of the patent can… [read post]
