Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 461 - 480 of 19,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am by Paul Horwitz
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
State, to fit within the category of an illegal sentence, the illegality must inhere in the sentence itself, i.e., there either has been no convinction warranting any sentence or the sentence is not a permitted one for the conviction upon which it was imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantially unlawful. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
234/06 P Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM -- and here it is again. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 pm by Helen Macpherson
Section 27(1)(a) states that a trade mark application must be in the name of a person who “claims to be the owner of the trade mark”. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 pm by Helen Macpherson
Section 27(1)(a) states that a trade mark application must be in the name of a person who “claims to be the owner of the trade mark”. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The GC found to be equally irrelevant the circumstance that K-Swiss managed to have the five stripes registered as trade mark in eight Member States. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:50 pm by Jon Levitan
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Janus v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am by David Gans
Today marks the 58th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]