Search for: "State v. Mark T. Smith"
Results 461 - 480
of 987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Falwell (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this service mark specimen of use: In re Health Fusion Brands, Inc (TTABlog) [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(Patently-O) CAFC: Deficient claim for priority can’t be fixed in a subsequent continuation: Encyclopaedia Britannica v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Patently-O) CAFC: Deficient claim for priority can’t be fixed in a subsequent continuation: Encyclopaedia Britannica v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:32 pm
Supreme Court Ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
The government also argues that the posture of the case lacks merits – in particular that Cooper’s collateral challenge to the procedures doesn’t work. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
" They conclude, with regard to federal and state positions, "[t]his carefully chosen language strongly reinforces the Constitution's global officer/legislator distinction. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
The case is Latimer v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
Second, since White obliterated the legal theory underlying the class action/collateral estoppel case now pending (Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
See also United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Nick Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture's determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
It's something that the California Supreme Court didn't allow in Merrill v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:25 am
Michel and John T. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
(quotation marks omitted). [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
Any social network trying to parse Facebook’s list won’t be able to tell whether “John Smith” refers to John Smith in Haight-Ashbury, John Smith in Sri Lanka, or John Smith the 17th-century British explorer. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:25 am
See, e.g., DeLisio v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 3:39 am
Concepcion, and Smith v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Mark Hilborn, a board-certified radiologist. [read post]
