Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 461 - 480
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
State, to fit within the category of an illegal sentence, the illegality must inhere in the sentence itself, i.e., there either has been no convinction warranting any sentence or the sentence is not a permitted one for the conviction upon which it was imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantially unlawful. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:42 am
Teal Bay Alliances, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 pm
Section 27(1)(a) states that a trade mark application must be in the name of a person who “claims to be the owner of the trade mark”. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 pm
Section 27(1)(a) states that a trade mark application must be in the name of a person who “claims to be the owner of the trade mark”. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
This dates back to the antebellum Supreme Court decision in Prigg v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
In Brinkmeier v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Corporation v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:48 pm
I just listened to the State of Maine v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:50 pm
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Janus v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:34 am
On December 10, 2013 the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in EPA v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:34 am
On December 10, 2013 the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in EPA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:20 pm
Mark your calendars for Wednesday, November 18, 2009, from 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The GC found to be equally irrelevant the circumstance that K-Swiss managed to have the five stripes registered as trade mark in eight Member States. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
Furthermore, the second syllable of each mark starts with the letter ‘m’, which is pronounced in the same way for both marks. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
Today marks the 58th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
