Search for: "State v. Monroe" Results 461 - 480 of 898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2008, 12:56 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeWife Convicted of Slavery Denied Release Pending Sentence; Husband Returned to Home DetentionUnited States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:26 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Monroe County District Attorney, in its Respondent's brief contended that the appeal had to be dismissed because Dizak failed to serve his notice of appeal in a timely manner. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am by Andrew Frisch
State of Iowa, 165 F.R.D. 89, 92 (S.D.Iowa 1996) (considering potential prejudice to the defendant and judicial economy), Monroe v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:32 am
In Conrick v Myers, 461 US 1l38, the United States Supreme Court established a two-prong test with respect to claims of dismissal in retaliation for "whistle blowing. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
CMG, which also represents such celebrity images as Marilyn Monroe, Jackie Robinson and Babe Ruth, has attempted "on numerous occasions" to make Twitter take action to block and identify owners of various unauthorized accounts. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 7:24 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Thinn Nyunt
Other articles have said that Charterers should still seek an ETA in the charter terms so as to ensure that they fall within Monroe. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:56 pm
As pointed out in the Sui Generis-a New York Law Blog, at issue in Martinez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Moreover, since the issue of MEI's capacity to commence an action was not determined on appeal, collateral estoppel does not bar relitigation of that issue (see Tydings v Greenfield, Stein &amp; Senior, LLP, 11 NY3d 195, 200; Sabbatini v Galati, 43 AD3d 1136; Bergstol v Town of Monroe, 305 AD2d 348). [read post]