Search for: "State v. Morales" Results 461 - 480 of 6,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2016, 2:53 am by Edith Roberts
City of Miami and Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Bishops Conference stated that “the degrading and distortion of religious symbols by purposely changing their meaning is contrary to public morals, especially when it is done in pursuit of commercial gain”. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:11 pm
  In this case, the government's primary justification in the state of Texas, where the legislature had reformed its sodomy law during the 1970s to exempt opposite-sex couples from its operation, was moral disapproval of homosexuality. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 7:18 am by Eleonora Rosati
As it is stated in the EUIPO Guidelines, “the Office will refuse the mark when it can be perceived as describing the subject matter of the goods and services and thus has not the capacity to identify the commercial origin of the goods or services. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel discusses Comcast v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
 On this specific point, the court first recalled that the California courts have set a high bar for repugnancy and underlined that, according to the Ohno’s decision, which dealt with Japanese tort law, repugnancy does not mean that the foreign judgment is contrary to the U.S. public policy, but rather that it is so offensive to the public policy to be prejudicial to recognized standards of morality and to the general interests of the citizens. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:00 pm
In late 2016, in its highly-watched decision in Salman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Percy & Wayne Sandholtz, Why norms rarely die Anette Stimmer & Jess Gliserman, Disentangling norms, morality, and principles: the September 2019 Brexit rebellion Mathias Koenig-Archibugi & Luka Bareis, Do international parliaments matter? [read post]