Search for: "State v. Nails"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
It’s another small nail into what I hope is the coffin of Calder, my least-favorite Supreme Court case of all time. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm
In Sheppard v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:21 am
§101.60(c)(2)(v)). [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:54 am
In Natale v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 5:08 am
Although federal and state health officials in North Dakota have been unable to zero in on the exact cause of the outbreak there, they posit it likely had to do with lapses related to blood services, nail care or foot care – or some combination. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 4:33 pm
With the recent 11th Circuit decision in Franza v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:36 am
From United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
* Knives, nails and nippers: forging ahead with the Laguiole mark. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:43 pm
Make no mistake about it: insurance companies are in business to make money, and they will often fight tooth and nail to avoid paying legitimate claims. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:11 pm
In NC Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:34 pm
First up was Holt v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
Both the liability verdict and the damages award have been affirmed in Walker v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:21 am
State Analysis Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:08 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
In SCVT v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
In Ford v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The 1709 Blog carries the results of the black-crested macaque selfie sidebar poll, which turned out to less exciting than some of us had hoped, on account of so many people agreeing that no copyright existed at all in works created by animals [this Kat wonders whether this might be another nail in the much-cited dictum of Petersen J in University of London Press Limited v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch. 601 that "what is worth copying is prima facie… [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
The Ninth Circuit Sure Doesn’t Know–Nguyen v. [read post]
