Search for: "State v. Oliver" Results 461 - 480 of 1,352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2008, 1:24 pm
Oh my, how far we have come...On May 21, 1961, civil rights leaders Oliver Hill, Roy Wilkins, and Reverend Francis L. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 3 October and Friday 4 October 2024, there was a trial before Hill J in the case of Oliver v Duffy KB-2023-002483. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
He contends that he stated the gist of a meritorious claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not arguing that the State knowingly used false or misleading testimony to obtain the indictment. . . .People v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:42 pm
The Plaintiffs also brought state law claims against Morgan Stanley under Tenn. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Rather, inspired by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., the United States presently embraces them by willfully ignoring how Holmes punished Porfirio Díaz’s leading critic Eugene V. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73  [week ending on Sunday 22 November] –  Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles |  Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
”  Justice Kennedy seemingly reached the opposite conclusion in Gonzales v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:50 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Here's the description I wrote for the law school's online course catalogue:Since the so-called New Deal Settlement of the late 1930s, courts have largely adhered to the view expressed by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in his dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]