Search for: "State v. P. G."
Results 461 - 480
of 2,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 10:59 am
Reference: ERISA § 206(d)(3)(B); IRC § 414(p)(1); Advisory Opinion 90-46A; see Boggs v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
David P. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
David P. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am
P. 26(f) (United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah) District of Vermont Rule 26. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:17 am
V. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:21 am
Tropp v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
By Steven G. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
By Steven G. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over remains unchanged at $3,000.The annual compensation limitation under Section 401(a)(17) for eligible participants in certain governmental plans that, under the plan as in effect on July 1, 1993, allowed cost of living adjustments to the compensation limitation under the plan… [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:52 pm
” g. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Liberal, Confucian, and Socialist Theories of Enterprise Organization (and State, Family, and Personhood), (Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 37, p. 637, 2014).From SSRN (non-US law):Richard Moon, Religious Accommodation and Its Limits: The Recent Controversy at York University, (Constitutional Forum, Vol. 23, Forthcoming).Nathalie Des Rosiers, Free Religions or Freedom from Religion? [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:18 am
Facts: This case (Guthrie v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 8:47 pm
Ganis Part V. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
(with whom Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
David P. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
David P. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 1:35 am
Case Name: Nickle v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:39 pm
Only six-months ago, in B & G Management v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:39 pm
Only six-months ago, in B & G Management v. [read post]