Search for: "State v. Poling"
Results 461 - 480
of 598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:04 pm
No, this time its the POLE that is making the news. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:55 pm
Aug. 26, 2011)(per curiam opinion)(grant of more relief than requested, finality and partial summary judgment, harmful error analysis, exception to rule that ground must be stated in the summary judgment motion)G & H TOWING COMPANY, ET AL. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:22 pm
Three years ago, a Texas court ruled that the state could not impose a $5 per customer “pole tax” at strip clubs. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:40 pm
It decides the fee is not "content based" and therefore the relatively lax standard of United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:13 pm
Hecht, writing for the majority and upholding the state’s “pole tax” in Combs v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 1:22 pm
Thus, NEMA maintains that six-pole motors are not within the definition if they exceed .5 horsepower; that four-pole motors are not if they exceed .75 horsepower; and that two-pole motors are not if they exceed 1 horsepower. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
County of El, Paso, Texas, 118 F.3d 421 (5th Cir. 1997); that the relevant state did not actually guarantee secret and independent voting to its citizens without disabilities (Nelson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:15 am
The anthropologists tell you that you have been at the bottom of the mating pole for millennia; the business press keeps looking for Alpha males with animal spirits to kick-start the economy. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm
" Hummel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
The courts have heard a constitutional challenge to the law, Combs v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:18 am
Lowe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
This is hardly an unprecedented state of affairs. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:56 am
A different result was reached in Enns Pontiac, Buick & GMC Truck v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:59 am
The Court held in Lynch v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:56 pm
But such a defense of the debate about mathematical analysis of evidence is a bit like saying that WWII was a good thing because it led to the development of V-2 rockets. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:19 pm
Kelowna (City) v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:19 pm
Kelowna (City) v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
- Lancaster attorney Patti Spencer in her Pennsylvania Fiduciary Litigation Blog Pole dancing and an interesting insight into BigLaw document review - Chicago lawyer Patrick J. [read post]
