Search for: "State v. Primes"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
A business must be certified as a DBE before it or a prime contractor can rely on its DBE status in bidding for a contract. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:07 pm
Laws c. 143 § 51, (“§ 51″) a plaintiff may be able to bring a strict liability claim against a building owner for injuries caused by violating state building codes under § 51. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:07 pm
In R. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am
State, 282 Ga. 68, 73 (4) (b) (2007). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am
State, 282 Ga. 68, 73 (4) (b) (2007). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am
State, 282 Ga. 68, 73 (4) (b) (2007). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 5:58 am
YES Heiskell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 11:10 am
In the case of Mesić v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:41 pm
It reversed and remand the case for further proceedings.Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
Google * Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
Devries, arbitration case in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
In the notorious 1959 Roncarelli v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm
One of these measures is the blocking in the EU of the Russian state media RT (Russia Today) and Sputnik (link). [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:28 pm
Defense of the State from war, certainly raises a vital public need, that every prime minister, including an outgoing prime minister must deal with. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
In deciding this question, the Court had regard to the Grand Chamber’s judgment in Perinçek v Switzerland [2015] ECHR 907 [26]-[27], which stated that Article 17 only applies ‘on an exceptional basis and in extreme cases’ and, further, that the decisive point under Article 17 is whether ‘the applicant’s statements sought to stir up hatred or violence, and whether by making them he attempted to rely on the Convention to engage in an activity or… [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
Sanders, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:09 pm
Austria (civil defamation), Bédat v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
This past Term's Lozman v. [read post]
