Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 461 - 480 of 4,923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
For every negative thing the author states, another poster could state the opposite with equal conviction and neither would be a provable fact. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
United States (drug felony, misdemeanor, facilitate, cellular phone) Dean, Christopher M. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 1:50 pm
Just a quick note on the Admin Court decision in Gilboy, R (on the application of) v Liverpool City Council & Anor [2007] EWHC 2335 (Admin). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Water Resources Control Board (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 991; see 10/11/17 post. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:46 am by aallwash
While we haven’t learned much about the FISC’s legal interpretation of these two key provisions, here’s a brief guide to what we do know:  Section 702 Title VII, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), “Procedures for targeting certain persons outside the United States other than United States persons” (50 USC § 1881a) Allows for targeting of communications of foreign persons located abroad for foreign… [read post]