Search for: "State v. Rand"
Results 461 - 479
of 479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2008, 8:44 am
-Dental Bldg., 113 AD2d 276 [1985]; JMJ Contract Mgt. v Ingersoll-Rand Co., 100 AD2d 291, 293 [1984]). [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 10:05 am
Rand v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 5:54 pm
Today, in Moody v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:28 pm
Id.; United States v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Markman, Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Rand, and others in the Michigan Attorney General's office. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 5:43 am
Malone v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
Rand, No. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:44 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Rand McNally & Co. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n, 505 U.S. 88, 98-100(1992) (related statutory sections, legislative history, and administrative "contemporaneous interpretation").Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. [read post]
The Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice Report on Antitrust and Intellectual Property
23 Jul 2007, 10:28 pm
The report discusses various strategies to mitigate hold-up, including the use of disclosure requirements and “reasonable and nondiscriminatory” (RAND) licensing terms. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:43 pm
" The whole case, Rosen v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:11 pm
(Moody v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:08 am
Rosen v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
The Complaint Counsel argued that this “evidentiary gap” could be closed because “Rambus would not have issued the commitment to license on RAND [Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory] terms required by JEDEC and EIA regulations,” pointing “to evidence that show[ed] that Rambus did not want to license technology on RAND terms and that it even made statements that offering RAND terms was contrary to its business… [read post]
13 Oct 2005, 7:06 pm
Commonwealth, 78 Pa. 490; Rand v. [read post]
