Search for: "State v. Register" Results 461 - 480 of 12,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Board erred by failing to consider whether the registered BROOKLYN BREW SHOP mark has acquired distinctiveness for beer-making kits. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am by Afro Leo
  Firstrand argued that parts of the mark in question were obscured and unidentifiable and presented a photocopy of the Register in evidence. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:15 am by gmlevine
The consensus is that no “presumption [of validity] arises from a pending application to register a mark,” Aspen Grove, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Ciaravino, 752 S.W.2d 923, 927 (Mo.App. 1988) (quoting State Savings Trust Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:06 am by Nikki Siesel
 The Lanham Act Section 2(a) states that trademarks should be refused on the Principal Register if the trademark consists of immoral or scandalous matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In the Act, the legislature declared that title to shoreline land naturally accreted cannot be registered by anyone except the State, and that only the State could quiet title to accreted land. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:18 am by By Molly Rugg, Paralegal, ACLU
Voters who register to vote using a state form can vote in all elections, but voters who register using the standard federal form can only vote in federal elections. [read post]