Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 461 - 480
of 71,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
The USMJ’s R&R is rejected. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones… [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:11 am
7Cir Affirms District Court's Finding of Wrongful RemovalJackson County Bank, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:37 am
The State (Trinidad And Tobago) [2008] UKPC 16 (3 March 2008) Knight v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:45 am
Editor’s Note: David A. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 11:10 am
New York State's highest court hears oral argument in Golden Gate Yacht Club v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) SL (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 225 (11 March 2010) Farinloye & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 203 (11 March 2010) Priory Caring Services Ltd v Capita Property Services Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 226 (11 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) McVey & Ors, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:37 am
State, the Washington Supreme Court declared the state's charter school law unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 7:34 pm
When called to testify, N.S. stated that she wished to wear a niqab which covered her face, and which she insisted was a necessary part of her Muslim faith. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:33 am
Supreme Court docket to watch, from the highly publicized Fourth Amendment GPS tracking case in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:37 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Widdows, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1500 (21 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) EH v Kent County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 709 (21 June 2011) AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 710 (21 June 2011) IR (Sri Lanka) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 704 (21 June 2011) J Varney & Sons Waste Management Ltd. v Hertfordshire… [read post]
Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, Germaninvestments AG, v. Allomet Corp., Docket No. 291, 2019
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
(Hldg.) v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:46 am
It should be read together with the Court’s judgment in R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 38. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
United States,... [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
R (DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7- 8 October 2019. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:46 am
The support the Court cited to in making this point, Judge Brody noted, was none other than Toys "R" Us Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Reed and Lord Kerr dissented stating that the critical factors in the ECtHR decision of Allen should have been followed and consequently it is necessary for the Secretary of State to examine the judgment of the Court of Appeal to determine whether the criteria of s 133 were satisfied. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
The main issue in R v Spencer 2014 SCC 43 was whether a user of the Internet has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her basic subscriber information held by the user’s ISP that prevents the police from obtaining this information from the ISP without a warrant or court order. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
The main issue in R v Spencer 2014 SCC 43 was whether a user of the Internet has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her basic subscriber information held by the user’s ISP that prevents the police from obtaining this information from the ISP without a warrant or court order. [read post]
