Search for: "State v. Short" Results 461 - 480 of 22,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, SAMHSA issued exemptions to allow state regulatory authorities to request more flexible take-home restrictions. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Simply because bluntly stating “says the paedophile” and “pretty rich coming from a paedophile” isn’t rhetoric at all: “Those were short and pithy tweets of between three and six words….they do not give the appearance of being carefully considered or crafted. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:58 pm by Rick Garnett
(There were a lot of back-and-forth postings about the Bush v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm by Peter Mahler
The result, according to plaintiffs, was that the defendants were overpaid, and the plaintiffs were shorted, millions in distributions from the net proceeds from the sale of the properties. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
  In short, it might tend to produce further, greater acts of insurrectionary violence or rebellion directed against our constitutional order. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]