Search for: "State v. So"
Results 461 - 480
of 117,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 4:18 pm
(quoting State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 8:27 am
This is the ruling by the Kentucky Supreme Court in its recent decision, University of Louisville v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 12:26 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm
So, let’s start with the…not so good: The Supreme Court of Mississippi in Alford v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 6:11 pm
So, where there such grounds in Smith v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:02 pm
By doing so, EPA and the Army jumped ahead of the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
Today, the Solicitor General filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 6:31 pm
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
But he's a member of the Bar, so he's facially subject to such a requirement.But one exemption is for full-time state employees. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:33 am
In Dyno Nobel v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:30 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:02 am
Oh, they feel so sorry for the poor! [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:33 pm
King (7th Cir. 2003) 349 F.3d 964 (King) and United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:41 pm
So my overall take is that this seems like error-correction just to make sure the state Supreme Courts are paying attention. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
On February 4, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
