Search for: "State v. So " Results 461 - 480 of 117,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2017, 8:27 am
This is the ruling by the Kentucky Supreme Court in its recent decision, University of Louisville v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm by admin
  So, let’s start with the…not so good: The Supreme Court of Mississippi in Alford v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
  But he's a member of the Bar, so he's facially subject to such a requirement.But one exemption is for full-time state employees. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:02 am
  Oh, they feel so sorry for the poor! [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:41 pm
So my overall take is that this seems like error-correction just to make sure the state Supreme Courts are paying attention. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm by MBettman
On February 4, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:28 am
" In fact, most of us are not so constantly self-aware of our emotional states. [read post]