Search for: "State v. Starks" Results 461 - 480 of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court notes that, during the sign-up process, an alert states “BY CREATING AN UBER ACCOUNT, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF SERVICE & PRIVACY POLICY. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
The decision also rejected an appointments challenge under United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am by Adam Chandler
Writing for AOL Politics Daily, Andrew Cohen predicts that the Court is likely to rule in favor of former Attorney General John Ashcroft in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, explaining that he doesn’t “think the Court would have accepted the review if it wanted to endorse the 9th Circuit’s view and allow former executive branch officials to face trial — even in the stark circumstances presented by al-Kidd and his lawyers. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 3:45 am
Patrick Guinane of the NWI Tmes writes today on yesterday's 3-2 ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court in the case of Porter County Sheriff Department v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
Justice Andrews sat on New York’s highest court for most of the 1920s and dissented from Justice Cardoza in other famous instances, including Meinhard v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
Justice Andrews sat on New York’s highest court for most of the 1920s and dissented from Justice Cardoza in other famous instances, including Meinhard v. [read post]