Search for: "State v. Stock"
Results 461 - 480
of 6,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
The Court explained: Appellants seek to induce us to reject State Street's actions by having us apply a presumption of prudence which is afforded fiduciaries when they decide to retain an employer's stock in falling markets, first articulated in Kuper v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:50 am
By Eric Goldman Jones v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:03 am
In Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 9:32 am
Comparing it to reinvesting a stock dividend, the Court concluded that Tolliver promoted the drug conspiracy by using the proceeds he received to buy additional drugs. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:00 pm
One thing is for certain about the decision in US v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 9:55 am
In SEC v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:39 pm
The case, McMIllen v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:11 am
Supreme Court Ruling The United States Supreme Court recently considered this issue in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:12 pm
In Speedemissions, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:25 am
His state action claim was rejected a couple of years ago. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:20 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:06 am
" He relies on the Court's holding in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
In Medafor, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:13 pm
The Court emphasized that Lewis v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:43 am
In fact, in an reported case last year entitled K.C. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]