Search for: "State v. Strange"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:11 pm
In NC Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN> Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:44 am
An in-depth analysis of the decision, Kulstad v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:57 am
(Strangely, Womack is also listed as concurring with the dissent, but he's not listed among the judges signing onto the actual dissent.) [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
Since what the Directive purports to protect is privacy rather than economic rights, it would be strange if the Directive could not compensate those individuals whose data privacy had been invaded by a data controller so as to cause them emotional distress (but not pecuniary damage). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:02 pm
PNC Bank and Strang v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
Yet in Anderson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:21 am
This case is an exception, one of the few immunity cases in the Supreme Court that do not favor the police.The case is Sause v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 3:46 am
Jennings v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:33 am
For the Associated Press, Wayne Parry previews Christie v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
For those of you who are novices in this strange and wondrous area, 1. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
But are you also guilty of the (much bigger) felony offense of bringing drugs into jail in violation of Penal Code sect. 4573, which states that "Except when otherwise authorized . . . any person who, knowingly brings or sends into, or knowingly assists in bringing into, or sending into, any state prison . . . or into any county . . . jail . . . any controlled substance . . . is guilty of a felony. . . . [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm
In Sarah Milov’s paper, “Clearing the Air: Shimp v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:33 am
The Royal Albert Hall is a cultural icon, so it's strange that it so rarely gets a mention on this most cultural of weblogs. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
In Westwood Apex v. [read post]
