Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 461 - 480
of 869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:14 am
Wainwright) and there's the right to have that counsel be at least minimally effective (Strickland v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
[I]t is apparent both that the claim of ineffective assistance was exhausted in the military courts and that it was briefed under the correct legal standard, namely, Strickland v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:17 am
Ed. 2d 657 (1984), or, in the alternative, that he had failed to show deficient performance and prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Strickland (07-689), on whether a racial minority group that makes up less than 50 percent of a proposed legislative district can state a vote dilution claim under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act; Pearson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
State of New York U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Cronic prejudice standard applies (as every other state and federal court to consider the question has held), or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:48 pm
Claims that an attorney’s performance was so poor that it violated a defendant’s constitutional right to the assistance of counsel are reviewed under a standard outlined by the Supreme Court in Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:34 am
United States U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Strickland (07-689), on whether a racial minority group that makes up less than 50 percent of a proposed legislative district can state a vote dilution claim under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
(33) Kansas v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Kulbicki 14-848Issue: Whether an appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 pm
Foster12-420Issue: Whether a federal habeas court must grant Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) deference to both components of a state court’s merits adjudication of a defendant’s Strickland v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
As Wikipedia notes, in Strickland v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:34 am
United States Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
Strickland, 321 N.C. 31, 39, 361 S.E.2d 882, 886–87 (1987) (prior assaults); Morgan, 315 N.C. at 635, 340 S.E.2d at 90 (same); but see State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:26 pm
State v. [read post]
