Search for: "State v. Utter" Results 461 - 480 of 1,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2019, 7:27 am by Eric Goldman
Accordingly, the State is enjoined from enforcing these provisions against Plaintiffs during the pendency of this suit. * Davison v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 6:01 pm by Marty Lederman
  And several Justices of the Supreme Court--sometimes even a majority--will, in at least some important cases (e.g., Trump v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm by Hannah Diaz
The rounds continued to challenge participants as the night progressed, especially during the Supreme Court Audio Round, where everyone listened intently to Justice Ginsburg's timeless words, "make pot legal" and "bong hits for Jesus" while trying to name the court case they had been uttered during (Walker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:10 am by Rachel Casper
” ‘Crap’ may or may not be the exact word choice, but we have heard many such utterances. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
One of the cases referenced in the Mueller Report is United States v Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593 (1995), in which the Court held that uttering false statements to an investigating agent who might or might not testify before a grand jury is not sufficient to constitute obstruction. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
One of the cases referenced in the Mueller Report is United States v Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593 (1995), in which the Court held that uttering false statements to an investigating agent who might or might not testify before a grand jury is not sufficient to constitute obstruction. [read post]