Search for: "Stewart, Appeal of"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
TSWA, dissatisfied with the decision, appealed, relying on three grounds, as follows: (i) The use of the mark was of such a nature as to deceive the public as to its geographical origin, and was thus contrary to s 7(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act ("TMA");(ii) The registration of the mark is contrary to s. 3 of the Geographical Indications Act (1999 Rev Ed.) [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:09 am
On appeal, the tenants’ argument that CA Property Management Ltd was merely an agent for Mr and Mrs Gardner was rejected. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:03 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and pressed by the environmental groups, is too unpredictable to serve as a plausible trigger for the Clean Water Act’s permitting requirement. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:08 am
[An interesting analysis, handed down last month] From Magistrate Judge Stewart Aaron's report and recommendation in DAddio v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:07 am
Soto appealed. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
For Impeachment Witnesses, Testifying Can Cost $15,000 MSN – Sharon LaFraniere (New York Times) | Published: 10/24/2019 As a parade of State Department officials began trooping to Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry imperiling President Trump, officials from the department’s employee association dispatched an appeal to its nearly 17,000 members. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
Pertinent to this appeal are the charges related to T.M. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am
By 2013, Parker had exhausted all his appeals, none of which was successful. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
Stewart v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
On September 4, 2015, the WCJ granted Stewart’s request and designated the August 4, 2015 judgment as final and appealable. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 11:24 pm
This article is by Robin Stewart of Anthony Gold and first appeared on the Anthony Gold website. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Section 141 (appealing to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) where there is no requirement that the applicant must pay the USPTO’s personnel expenses. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
Pertinent to this appeal are the charges related to T.M. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 6:28 pm
’” Stewart Agency, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:13 pm
Azar and Stewart v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:35 pm
Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart and was a partner with law firm Morrison & Foerster. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:37 pm
US Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart spoke on behalf of the PTO, arguing the term “expenses” is clear to include all expenses that may arise upon defending its decision to deny a patent, including the cost of the attorneys’ work. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
Doe, 2005 FCA 193 (CanLII), < > which Judge Von Finckenstein, as he then was, and the Federal Court of Appeal established that:“... [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
STEWART: We are not. . . . [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm
That procedure is not the norm; the typical way to challenge the denial of a patent is by an appeal to the Federal Circuit, which reviews the case on the administrative record compiled by the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
