Search for: "Strauss v. Strauss" Results 461 - 480 of 538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Spicy IP)   Israel Israel applies to be PCT international search authority (The IP Factor) Tel Aviv District Court refuses preliminary injunction to Strauss Ice Creams who claims packaging on Nestle’s ‘La Cremeria’ ice cream infringes its ‘Cremisimo’ ice cream (The IP Factor)   Kenya Africa Growth and Opportunity Act: Trade breaks or heartbreaks? [read post]
17 May 2008, 7:48 am
If we re-start in this Strauss will have to come out in a snorkel. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Catching up on their emails, the IPKat and Merpel have just discovered news of yet another juicy trade mark dispute which the German Bundesgerichtshof has decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it's Case C-12/12, better known to people who can't even remember easy case numbers as Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:11 pm by Zoe Tillman
His Supreme Court work included defending affirmative action policies in several landmark cases, including 2003’s Gratz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am by Joshua Matz
Michaels Professor of Law UCLA School of Law Timothy Naftali Senior Research Scholar Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs Victoria Nourse Ralph V. [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:55 am
Markowitz, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Thursday, May 6, 2021 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation Business and Politics: When Should Companies Take a Public Position? [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Colin Murray
In the 1950s Leo Strauss had criticised the degree to which public debate in the United States had descended into what he described as “reductio ad Hitlerum“, whereby opponents of a policy would liken it to a fascist policy or label its proponents Nazis to score political points (regardless of the distinctions between the policy and those pursued by the Nazis). [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm by Cary Coglianese
Her innovative case study on the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]