Search for: "Strong v. Georgia"
Results 461 - 480
of 716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2012, 2:55 am
Technical College System of Georgia v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
Georgia In May, Gov. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
Handed down on the Wednesday morning of last week by Mr Justice Norris, the latest episode in the burgeoning saga in Fabio Perini S.P.A. v LPC Group PlC & Paper Converting Machine Company Italia & Others [2012] EWHC 911 (Ch) is an absorbing (or, Merpel asks, should that be absorbent?) [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
Twiggs v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
LEXIS 44653 (ND GA, March 29, 2012) a Georgia federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Merely pointing out that states don’t always follow one’s policy preferences is hardly a strong argument against federalism. (2) Professor Logan Sawyer of the University of Georgia Law School coincidentally has an excellent piece out on SSRN about the origins of Court’s holding in Hammer v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
Yesterday’s post was at pains to show how the Supreme Court, in Yee v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
The CAFC, in Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
In addition to the “We are Georgia” defense, defendants also play the “fair use non-profit give us a break card”, much like a football defender in the penalty box making a fair challenge on a strong opponent. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:29 am
This post is part of an ACSblog online symposium on oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:11 am
Courtesy of Tim Hedeen, we have a suggested new mediator orientation posted on the Georgia ADR Blog. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
The less aggressive redistricting plans adopted this cycle show that even strong partisans have absorbed the lesson that if you create a bunch of 53 percent districts you can lose them when your side’s support goes down by 4 or 5 percent.Justice O'Connor said it best in the original political gerrymandering case, Davis v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
See Katzenbach v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:27 am
Limbaugh would have two strong first amendment defenses. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
EU v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
If these two strong opponents of Citizens United see that conflict, then presumably the Citizens United majority does as well. [read post]
