Search for: "Sullivan v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON, L.L.P., No 09 Civ. 5593 (RJS)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 10:53 am
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memo by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.) [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am by Florian Mueller
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:38 am
And Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
The statute can survive strict scrutiny only if it is "narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest," United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am by Ben
Visitors to the domain arwew now confronted by a notice which states that the FBI has taken control of the site 'pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States District Court'. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:44 am by Florian Mueller
At any rate, I would view the $5 per-unit refund to BlackBerry as another indication of my $20 per-unit royalty estimate not having been off base.If Qualcomm's royalty levels are indeed extremely high, it comes as no surprise that various major automative and information and communications technology companies are interested in the ongoing FTC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:49 pm by Reference Staff
The day commemorates the signing of the United States Constitution on September 17, 1787 and schools receiving federal funding must annually “hold an educational program on the United States Constitution on September 17. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:24 pm
In addition, even if New York law allows for jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction in the case must "comport with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution" – i.e., there must be minimum contacts with the forum jurisdiction. [read post]