Search for: "Supreme Court U.S.A." Results 461 - 480 of 666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2012, 8:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar has requested that Congress enact a “legislative fix” for the Supreme Court opinion in Carcieri v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:02 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
According to the United States Supreme Court, a defendant, after being advised by a competent attorney, can determine there is sufficient evidence for a finding of guilty and a guilty plea is in his best interest, but defendant would not have to actually admit to the specific facts. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:13 pm
Consultants, Inc. v ARA Plumbing & Heating Corp., 63 AD3d 1029, 1030-1031; Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v National Fire & Mar. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:05 pm
The district court's conclusion that the rules are substantive rather than procedural rests on APA cases that do not involve that distinction at all, and the court's standards for measuring the "substantiveness" of rules are at odds with the Supreme Court's jurisprudence under the Rules Enabling Act.The court compounded these errors by erroneously holding that Section 2(b)(2)(B), which provides for the USPTO to issue rules… [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 2:14 pm by Robin Shea
” When a court determines whether a government agency’s interpretation of a statute is valid, the  court applies the Supreme Court’s two-step analysis in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm
The court proceeded to analyze two Washington Supreme Court decisions in which the court refused to apply forum selection clauses because they were violative of Washington's public policy:  Dix v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., No. 08-5598 (6th Cir. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Supreme Court, which will grant certiorari for an expected oral argument in early 2012. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:08 am by Jason Rantanen
Because the ITC was interpreting the ambiguous term “articles” during formal adjudication, it is potentially eligible for strong deference under the Supreme Court’s Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Hyatt, in which the court will decide whether to overrule a precedent that allows a state to be sued in the courts of another state without its consent, and Home Depot U.S.A. [read post]