Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
Women's Bar Assn. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:50 pm
Brown to be declared actually innocent, though they were available in his files.People convicted of unconstitutional online solicitation statute were actually innocent The Texas Supreme Court has ruled that people convicted of online solicitation of a minor after the statute was deemed unconstitutional by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals qualify for innocence compensation under Texas statutes. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:06 pm
The country's evolving International Commercial Courts however question this take, argues Hong Kong University's Prof. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:47 am
Though we do not hear much about it from the Supreme Court, its text is very clear. [read post]
21 May 2025, 8:05 am
I also noted in the introduction that I'm not a dispassionate observer of Eugene's work: I consider him both a friend and an intellectual role model. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:22 am
Within that framework the complexities of delegating regulatory power presented both vertical and horizontal diffusion issues the framework of which has remained fairly stable in the West for over a century (despite lots of "fireworks" at the margins as recent Supreme Court cases in the US illustrate (e.g., here). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 9:43 am
In my case before Judge Redden, the court's written opinion is plagerized directly and verbatim from my opposition's brief. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
"There could be an argument made that that was the court's error to start with... [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision last June, the Biden administration announced they were indeed going to try to put together a new loan forgiveness plan using the HEA. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Souza (California Court of Appeals 1994) 9 Cal.4th 224, 230; People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The case of Suzuki and Monroe from the British Columbia Supreme Court in 2009 is instructive. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:35 pm
A Supreme Court (Kings County) judge in People v Smothers (20 Misc 3d 654[Sup Ct, Kings County 2008]), has issued a decision, which interprets Grajales and 710.30 as requiring the People to give 710.30 notice of their intent to offer in-court identification testimony of any witness who has previously identified the defendant in a photo-array or other photographic identification procedure, notwithstanding the People's lack… [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:58 pm
Here's the PDF of the brief filed with the Illinois Supreme Court. [read post]
18 May 2014, 4:52 pm
Thus, the drugs seized on the defendant's person were admissible as it was incidental to the defendant's arrest. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
The Supreme Court began its analysis of the issues before it by explaining that[c]ertiorari is an extraordinary remedy that is not granted as a matter of right, but rather at the court's discretion. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:05 am
Sectarian riots ensued, killing thousands of people....Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose Hindu-nationalist government has overseen a steady rise in violence against Muslims and other religious minorities, will play a key role in the ceremony—one observers say will mark the unofficial start of his campaign to win a third consecutive term when Indians go to the polls in the spring....In 2019, India's Supreme Court awarded the… [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 5:30 am
That's a racist view because it treats Judge Jackson as having a race while assuming that white people don't have a race and so they can be neutral. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 am
" (China Justice Observer: Highlights of China's Guiding Case System – Guiding Cases & Similar Cases Series; also here). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:39 pm
This was the substance of few people while dealing with the issue of 'impeccable integrity' while talking about former CVC Thomas and now the Supreme Court Judgment is respected by the Government. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
