Search for: "Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
The same rules apply for the implementation of new technology based systems. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:43 pm by Glenn
A colleague of mine, whose views on this topic differ, suggested in a debate recently that United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Arizona: The 9th Circuit, in Management and Engineering Technologies International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
A signal processing system for providing a plurality of realtime services to and from a number of independent client applications and devices, said system comprising: a subsystem comprising a host central processing unit (CPU) operating in accordance with at least one application program and a device handler program, said subsystem further comprising an adapter subsystem interoperating with said host CPU and said device; a realtime signal processing… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:22 am by Susan Brenner
According to the indictment, in late November 2010, WikiLeaks released a large amount of classified United States State Department cables on its website. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
 The Court of Appeal held that "only if no other possible construction is possible would a skilled man be forced to conclude that the patentee had claimed that which he knew was old" (Beloit Technologies Inc v Valmet Paper [1995] RPC 705 at 720). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
This Kat recently had an opportunity revisit the patent decision given by the United States Supreme Court on 20 March in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
  An analysis of the United States’ efforts at remediation and their applicability to Brazil. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
An employer may not use information gathered from social media in order to screen out applicants or take adverse action against an employee based on a protected category, such as race or age. [read post]