Search for: "T-3 Restaurants, Inc." Results 461 - 480 of 641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2007, 11:08 am
(Sign No. 3 under "Gifts": He tries to convince you he bought expensive chocolates for himself.) [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Are 2 & 3 contradictory? [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 10:05 am by Charlotte Garden
Sundance, Inc. is a Taco Bell franchisee that operates over 150 locations in multiple states. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 2:40 pm
(If you don't know what Brinker is, see here).It is unclear whether DLSE will follow this enforcement policy if the Supreme Court accepts review. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am by Rachel Sandler
DOI: http://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.205 [7] Amateur Sports Act of 1978.,95 P.L. 606, 92 Stat. 3045 [8] San Francisco Arts & Ath., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Tier 3—willful neglect, corrected within 30 days: The minimum penalty is $12,794; the maximum penalty is $63,973; and the calendar-year cap is $1,919,173. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am by Scott Hervey
” literally and didn’t wait and see whether the University actually filed an opposition. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
workers, farmers, truck drivers, restaurant owners, students who are lucky enough to have a car. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione Emilia-Romagna (IPKat) CFI clarifies… [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am by Rachel Sandler
That will no longer be the case.[24] [T]he current on-sale bar imposes penalties not demanded by any legitimate public interest. [read post]