Search for: "T. Halliburton" Results 461 - 480 of 575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2009, 3:08 am
Tracy Barker claimed she was raped in 2005 while working in Iraq for KBR inc. a former Halliburton Co. subsidiary. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:06 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
” In re AdvancePCS Health, L.P., 172 S.W.3d 603, 606 n.5 (Tex. 2005) (noting, however, that Texas Arbitration Act requires signatures for contracts of less than $50,000 or personal injury claims); see also In re Macy’s Tex., Inc., 291 S.W.3d 418, 418 (Tex. 2009) (per curiam) (observing that “[t]he FAA contains no requirements for the form or specificity of arbitration agreements except that they be in writing; it does not even require that they be signed”);… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
., Halliburton Company, Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Matthews-Daniel Company and Glen Carter. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 1:00 pm
We need your boss's help to ensure that the amendment isn't taken out of the bill in conference. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:40 am
Attorney LaSorsa sees first hand how many big corporations don't take sexual harassment claims seriously and instead hand out very inadequate discipline against the harassor. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
"That is why Congress could pass laws cutting off highway funds to states that didn't raise their drinking age to 21. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:08 pm
Halliburton, broad enough to include a sexual assault claim that occurred in worker housing. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Shouldn't they help get you out? [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:43 pm
Bunny Greenhouse was the Corps’ top procurement officer when she objected to the Bush administration’s no-bid contracts for Halliburton subsidiary KBR. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
" You Can’t Make This Stuff Up: As part of the eternal vigilance required in order to maintain this blog, I am constantly scouring the media for important developments. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 11:59 pm
In addition, we candiscern no judicially manageable standards for resolving the plaintiff's claims.Accordingly, we hold that the political question doctrine bars the plaintiff's suit,and we affirm the district court's dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.This is a disappointing decision in some respects, but I can't say it was wrongly decided.It's pretty weird when you think about it to have the United States Army, while at war, contract out its… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:54 am
What claimants can't go to court? [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
•    Damon Matteo, PARC •    Carl Horton, GE •    Sherry Knowles, GSK •    Peter Cicala, Shire Pharmaceuticals •    Todd Dickinson, AIPLA •    Ruud Peters, Philips IP & Standards •    Marshall Phelps, Microsoft … [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:33 pm
Typically, we usually don’t make much hay about such a correction, partly because we, as regular LB Readers know, are hardly in the position to, uh, throw stones at those who make an occasional glitch. [read post]