Search for: "THREE S CONSULTING v. US "
Results 461 - 480
of 5,385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2023, 2:14 pm
” By statute, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services determines a portion of these payments, known as the “uncompensated care” payment, using a three-factor analysis. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
The only case which bears a similarity to the present case is Gill v Kassam, but there are also significant differences: in particular, in that case the advisers used the online claims process, which Mrs Doble carefully avoids using. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:07 pm
”[1] The DPA required Ericsson to continue to cooperate with the Department in any ongoing investigations and prosecutions relating to the alleged FCPA violations, to enhance its compliance program, and to retain an independent compliance monitor for a period of three years.[2] Failure to comply with any part of the agreement would subject Ericsson to federal criminal prosecution, including the charges outlined in the criminal Information filed in conjunction with the… [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:02 pm
Most recently, in California v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Pelech v Pelech, [1984] CanLII 629 (BC SC), Mrs. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The introductory language to Item 402(v) provides that PVP disclosure must be included in any “proxy or information statement” for which the SEC requires executive compensation disclosure pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:39 am
Brixmor New Chastain Corners SC, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:53 am
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:54 am
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:40 am
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:22 am
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
Notice Kant's use of the phrase is, in a sense, diametrically opposed to Hobbes's. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Alice Hamilton published an article on the risks and benefits of industrial asbestos use, in a key labor unionist journal. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
See, e.g., the Fourth Circuit's recent opinion in PETA v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:27 pm
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:41 am
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
