Search for: "The New England Divisions Case"
Results 461 - 480
of 852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2011, 7:51 am
Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, was president of the Federal Tax Institute of New England, and a fellow of the American Bar Foundation. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 11:51 am
The promise is to … legislate for new ‘Local Connection’ and ‘UK Connection’ tests for social housing in England, to ensure this valuable but limited resource is allocated fairly. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
The “moral voice in journalism” also frees journalists to make the case for their own value to their communities, placing members of the press “back into the public that they represent through their work. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
The first instance Judges in the Queen’s Bench Division and Family Division adopted different approaches. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
Back in England, FDC then applied to amend their Particulars of Claim in order to clarify the nature of the acts which they alleged to constitute infringements and also to add some new ones. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
One such decision is Skype Technologies SA v Joltid Ltd and others [2009] EWHC 2783 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) ruling of Mr Justice Lewison on 6 November, which takes a little thinking about. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
The groups include alumni of South Texas College of Law Houston and New England School of Law. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:16 am
Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am
Specifically on religion/blasphemy, the ECtHR’s current case-law guide to Article 10 says this: “106. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:26 am
Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone, Mendes srl and Florence Pryen [2015] EWHC 836 (Ch) is a High Court, England and Wales, decision of Andrew Hochhauser QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division on 31 March. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:13 am
But that's not the case. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 6:23 am
Merpel adds, if counsel for the defendants had succeeded on behalf of its depilatory client, it would definitely be a case of a Bald-Win. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
At this point, all we can say for sure is that it will be an interesting case study for students of federalism and secession. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 10:36 am
Marriage bureau (Bain News Service, undated) (Source: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division). [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
This case is being handled out of the White Plains Division. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The big factors were (1) the case involves a claim for a tort committed in England; (2) that claim was probably governed by English law; (3) the passing off evidence would focus on consumers in England; (4) the governing law for the contract claims is state of Pennsylvania. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:15 am
Therefore this Kat would like to look at the concept of precedent and see what it means in reality, as opposed to jurisprudential theory.Binding precedentIn common law jurisdictions such as England and Wales, there is a rule that courts are bound by certain previous court decisions (for present purposes the details of which ones does not matter). [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 6:44 am
London ; New York : Routledge, 1997. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:42 am
In August 2008 subscription service Lawtel picked a curious little post-franchising case, ChipsAway International Ltd v Errol Kerr [2008] EWHC 1887 (Ch), a decision of the Chancery Division for England and Wales by Sir Andrew Park (see IPKat note here). [read post]
