Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Movies, Inc."
Results 461 - 480
of 545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2007, 7:29 pm
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
(2) Nike v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., about whether the Hobbs Act requires a [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:39 am
See Coach Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
See Coach Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
June 10 – Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm
For the People Theatres of NY, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Texaco Inc.? [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:06 am
If Warner Brothers decided to make a movie about the period, no reasonable person would think that all of the people depicted had cooperated with or endorsed the film, and the same standard should be applied to a videogame. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
Council 15 Local 159 v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:28 am
Kim Dotcom is to hacking what the 1995 movie Hackers is to hacking. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
These are apparently go-to accessories for people who don’t have skin. 5. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:41 am
The facts here may or may not be sufficient to show a defense based on acquiescence (See Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. [read post]
