Search for: "Tran v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 7:14 am
Samet v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 11:58 am
App. 2006), trans. denied. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 2:09 am
Firstly, in AM v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:31 am
Tran crafted a lengthy, well-reasoned opinion in Reading and Language Learning Center v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:31 am
Tran crafted a lengthy, well-reasoned opinion in Reading and Language Learning Center v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:06 am
Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
" Underscoring the Supreme Court's decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:27 am
"[E]very court retains continuing jurisdiction to reconsider its [own] prior interlocutory orders during the pendency of the action" (Liss v Trans Auto Sys., 68 NY2d 15, 20 [1986]), and may do so "regardless of statutory time limits concerning motions to reargue" (id.). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:02 pm
Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in the case of Bostock v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall later acknowledged [Pauli Murray’s first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color] as his ‘bible’ in the historic Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
The doctrine applies “where the issue in the second action is identical to an issue which was raised, necessarily decided and material in the first action, and the party who is being estopped had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the earlier action” (Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, 112 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Molnar v JRL S. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
That month, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) invalidated Safe Harbor as a data transfer mechanism in the case Schrems v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:54 am
Yesterday, the Court declared this application inadmissible as Art 4 of Protocol No 7, according to both its wording and the Court’s previous case law, ‘only concerned “courts in the same State”‘ (see the English Press Release). [35.] [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm
Tran 20-1541 [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
