Search for: "U S v. COOPER"
Results 461 - 480
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
Justice John Paul Stevens has announced his retirement from the U. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm
& Care, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:34 pm
Dismissal after testing positive in random drug test later declared inoperative by the Appellate Division ruled lawful*Matter of Goldin v Kelly, 2009 NY Slip Op 30646(U), March 11, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 109751/08, Judge: Eileen A. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:49 am
State f/u/o Whiteman, 192 Md. 419; Wolfe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:39 pm
Daily Mail Publishing Co., 443 U. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm
Op. 50662(U), 7 Misc 3d 1018(A) (Civil Ct. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:29 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
S. 208, 180 U. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
Mead Corp., 533 U .S. 218 (2001). [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Such was the case in Matter of Franzese (Franzese Realty Associates), 2009 NY Slip Op 33139(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County Dec. 16, 2009), in which Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Timothy S. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
U. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:56 am
S. 163 (1996), and Stutson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:20 am
Panzella, 13 Misc 3d 130(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 51842(U) (App Term, 1st Dept 2006) (affirming small claim court's award of damages to plaintiff chiropractor because, in disregard of assignment, defendant attorney failed to make direct payment of medical fees to plaintiff upon attorney's receipt of client's personal injury action settlement proceeds); Williamsburg South Medical v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
Curtis Daryl Cooper, unpublished opinion, App. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:56 am
Montano-Perez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:26 am
Two recent TTAB interlocutory rulings provide an indication that it will not be easy.In Societe Cooperative Vigneronne Des Grandes Caves Richon-Lezion and Zicron-Jacob Ltd v Albrecht-Piazza LLC, Opposition No. 91190040 ( September 20, 2009), the TTAB required the applicant-counterclaimant to amend its fraud-based petition for cancellation in light of Bose. [read post]
