Search for: "U. S. v. Held"
Results 461 - 480
of 5,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2009, 11:00 am
Supreme Court held that the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:11 am
S. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:32 am
Putting aside the question as to whether a particular corporate name is registrable as a trademark, or is simply a trade name not actionable under the UDRP, the Panel in Applied Technology Holdings, Inc. v. u-Logic, Dan Stirling, D2010-0042 (WIPO February 17, 2010) held that the Complainant (ipso facto) owned a common law trademark in APPLIED TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
Court for Western Dist. of Texas, 571 U. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:41 pm
Independence Tube Corp., 467 U. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:34 am
The Court’s decision in Manus Medical, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
S. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:13 am
On Monday the Supreme Court issued its decision in Vaden v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
Allen, 392 U. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:30 am
Court’s Decision in Arizona State Legislature v Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission The U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 10:37 am
A third decision that may be implicated as well is United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
While some companies have made the argument successfully that they had no knowledge of a partner’s intentions to transport their goods to New York (Ortiz v Food Mach. of Am., Inc.) (2014 NY Slip Op. 31868[U] [Bronx Ct. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:58 am
” 116 Stat. 2178, 6 U. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:26 pm
Brousard, the court held it’s not necessary that the sexual act occur, but rather the defendant tried to persuade the minor to engage in the conduct. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:42 am
Supreme Court held in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:26 pm
Today, in Acetris Health, LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:06 am
Fox, 464 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court held that the State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violated the First Amendment, overruling its earlier decision in Abood v Detroit Board of Education, 431 U. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:00 am
S. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
The Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, recently held in Nguyen v. [read post]
