Search for: "U. S. v. Holder"
Results 461 - 480
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
U. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:49 am
Two members of the modding community were able to create a mod that runs on a Wii U emulator (software which enables Wii U console games to be played on a PC), allowing multiple players to travel throughout the game’s fantastical setting of Hyrule together. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:52 am
AG Pro, Inc., 425 U. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
” Yamashita v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 3:31 am
Holder, 557 U. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
” Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:37 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:28 am
The Supreme Court most recently considered all of these issues in Holder v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:47 am
Platkin in Romanoff v Center for Rheumatology, LLP, 2016 NY Slip Op 50856(U) [Sup Ct Albany County May 24, 2016], centered on the question whether a partner who retired from a medical practice organized as an LLP that had no written partnership agreement and was dissolvable at will, and the business of which thereafter was continued by the other partners, was entitled to have his partnership interest valued inclusive of the practice’s goodwill value that he claimed… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:15 am
United States, 481 U. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
"Preliminary" means that the ECJ answers the question, and then the national court resumes its proceedings and enters its judgment, as opposed to a traditional appeal from a final judgment.When I saw the question referred to the ECJ, I already noticed that it was very well written, and I wish the Dusseldorf Regional Court had done a similarly good job in that Nokia v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 3:07 am
’s Bucket Buddies, Inc.], 2020 NY Slip Op 32446(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 24, 2020], Justice Masley summarily dismissed for legal insufficiency a § 1104 (c) dissolution petition brought by a 25% shareholder of a realty holding corporation due to the petition’s omission of any allegation that the shareholders “have ever held an annual meeting or elected directors during the company’s existence. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
An earlier post on this blog, examining a post-trial decision in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], described the minority shareholder’s dissolution claim under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law as a “classic case of minority shareholder oppression. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Importantly, as Holder noted, however, they have not been contested either by the Congress or by the courts. [read post]
