Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
” To succeed on a claim for trademark infringement or unfair competition under the Lanham Act, CS must prove that: (1) it owns the mark at issue; (2) the mark is valid and legally protectable; and (3) A1’s use of the mark is likely to create confusion. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
The U-T San Diego and Marcia Coyle of the Blog of Legal Times cover last week’s cert. grants in Riley v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 6:25 am
First, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s revised decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:22 am
S. 476, 483 (1957), incitement, Brandenburg v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:12 pm
("Johnny Cupcakes") is the company which sells merchandise emblazoned with Earle's Cupcake and Crossbones mark. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
S., at 117; Bazemore, 478 U. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:16 pm
Lemley, ICANN and Antitrust, 1 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
S., at 620 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:00 pm
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:28 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 8:16 am
S. 794, 797 (1976) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted), and its "structur[e] . . . as an appellate tribunal," Ohio v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:55 am
United States, 276 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
Goodyear Rubber Co., 128 U. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:16 am
However, used descriptively is ruled legal [Mind Candy Ltd v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:15 am
Bhd. of Teamsters v New York City Bd. of Collective Bargaining2022 NY Slip Op 33263(U)This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for publication in the Official Reports. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:15 am
Bhd. of Teamsters v New York City Bd. of Collective Bargaining2022 NY Slip Op 33263(U)This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for publication in the Official Reports. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]