Search for: "U.S. v. Sharp*"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
” West Virginia, 597 U.S., at ___, ___ (slip op., at 28, 31) (quoting Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:01 am
In that case, the property owners are asking the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 7:25 am
Hungary v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:43 pm
Williams, 2006 U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:47 pm
In Ben-Yisrayl v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
The brief argues that 42 U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
The Recorder has Feinstein Leaves 'Profound' Impact on California's Federal Bench -- In her 30 years as a U.S. senator, Dianne Feinstein, who died Friday at age 90, pushed five presidents to create a more diverse federal bench in California, said lawyers who helped her vet judicial candidates. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:49 pm
But there's no such thing as a war without functional weapons, and neither a U.S. case brought by Lenovo and its Motorola Mobility subsidiary nor Deutsche Telekom's German complaint have impressed the courts of law:Earlier this month, Judge Edward J. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm
In City Union Mission, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:13 am
[Chapman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:05 am
U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
The Canadian Legal History Blog explains:For our non-Canadian readers, the Persons Case, more formally known as Edwards v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
In Sharpe Holdings v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm
U.S. (08-876) and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:35 am
On that point, the detainees’ lawyers contended that the three judges’ unanimous opnion misunderstood the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am
Foreign Minister Wang Yi suggested that the Philippines v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 8:29 am
Under the Doe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Halliburton v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:08 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Janus v. [read post]
