Search for: "U.S. v. Sweet*"
Results 461 - 480
of 662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm
These trademarks have been registered with the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:05 am
There was a new motion filed in USA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The U.S. translation by A.W. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
LGBTQ communities have grown so large and robust, and there are so many places in the U.S. where many of them can thrive, that it’s possible to forget that almost all of these judicial victories are profoundly controversial. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
Under the descriptive fair use doctrine, a trademark can be used in its dictionary sense to describe the speaker’s own goods and services—that’s why Ocean Spray can market its cranberry juice as “sweet-tart” without infringing Nestle’s SweeTart trademark for candy. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:47 pm
If you are inclined to voice your concerns to the Court, please write to her at the following address: Re: United States of America v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am
Büchel and the 5Pointz Michelangelos v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
Indeed, a patent to refine potash into pearl ash, which is basically pure potassium carbonate, was patent no. 1 (now X1) issued by the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:46 pm
Hey, if the cream of the crop taxation attorneys in the U.S. had to debate it for hours until the answer was located, it’s no wonder so many non-tax attorneys and their CPAs have salivated at the idea, but refrained out of fear. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
For example, in Watts v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
May 20, 2010) the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a summary contempt citation and sentence imposed by U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 10:01 pm
In Swearingen v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Rakoff (U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
This decision, The Clorox Company Puerto Rico v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:22 pm
Because the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2020, 9:05 pm
About a year ago, in Kisor v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm
In the ongoing saga of human-trafficking-related claims against Signal International, which has been accused of trafficking over 500 Indian guestworkers to the U.S. after Hurricane Katrina, a federal court in Louisiana ruled that Signal may not use a previously undisclosed Facebook picture of one plaintiff and his assumed wife as impeachment evidence. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
The cases were all filed in the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
(Samson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:47 pm
AARP v. [read post]
