Search for: "UNIVERSAL SERVICE V POST-CONFIRMATION"
Results 461 - 480
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm
For purposes of continuous residence, children spending time away from home for education due to periods of study such as at university and people who have moved away up to 3 times due to the requirements of their job will be disregarded. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
But people will die if he is confirmed. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
Thapar sailed through a confirmation hearing that lasted less than 90 minutes, and he was confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 52-44 on May 25, 2017. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am
And in NAACP v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm
Guest post by Timothy Holbrook, Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law at Emory University School of Law. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:57 am
The case marks another circuit court’s application of the materiality standard announced in Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in Husted v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
Five hundred days into the Trump Administration, only 50 percent of the federal government’s “key” positions are filled with presidential appointees confirmed by the Senate, according to Partnership for Public Service and the Washington Post. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:52 pm
According to the Washington Post/Partnership for Public Service’s tracking of the top 600 executive positions requiring Senate confirmation, only half are nominated and confirmed. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am
The court stated: The testimony from the majority of jurors during the post-trial hearing confirms they were made aware of extraneous information concerning the possibility of a riot or some other sort of public disturbance or violence occurring if the jury did not find Christensen guilty of something. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
This post summarizes these developments. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am
Because he trusts his employees and just wants to confirm what a great job they all do and how high quality their products are one year after another? [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
As I showed in a prior lengthy blog post,[2] his criticisms were unfounded and overblown. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
(Indeed, the Ninth Circuit recently held in Oracle v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
The Unintended Consequences of the Injunction Law after eBay v. [read post]
