Search for: "US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS" Results 461 - 480 of 1,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2016, 6:12 pm by Jon Katz
– It seems that President Obama is relying on the Army Corps of Engineers to deal with the water protectors and their dispute over the project. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Army Corps of Engineers is examining possible alternate routes for the Dakota Access Pipeline. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Corps of Engineers (D.S.D.): 90-sisseton-brief us-army-corps-brief 92-sisseton-reply 93-dct-order An excerpt: For the reasons explained above, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ request for an injunction against the Corps, remands to the Corps for reconsideration whether the 2009 gully crossings were the type of undertaking that could affect historic properties under 36 C.F.R. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Army Corps of Engineers—and included $220 million in funding under the Safe Drinking Water Act for Flint, Michigan and other communities harmed by lead-tainted drinking water, a provision that the Senators from Michigan advocated for, but which is currently is absent from the version of the bill moving in the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:26 pm by Ilya Somin
I will be speaking on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in US Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 7:47 pm by Howard Friedman
Army Corps of Engineers, (D DC Sept. 9, 2016), the D.C. federal district court refused to enjoin construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation on sacred ancestral lands of the Sioux Tribe. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 16-09-08-complaint 16-09-08-press-release-re-complaint [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Army Corps of Engineers (ACoE), to excavate several mountaintops in West Virginia—the company, a subsidiary of coal giant Arch Coal, Inc., argued that the EPA acted unreasonably by failing to properly consider Mingo Logan’s reliance on the initial permit and failing to explain why the environmental impact of the project was harmful enough to justify revocation, but the court explained that the EPA enjoys “broad veto authority” under the Clean Water… [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
In the United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
After being retained by Pierce County, Washington, to develop a waste disposal facility in the early ‘80s, Resource Investments, Inc. acquired a parcel of “uniquely desirable” land – desirable, that is, for locating a trash dump – and went about securing necessary permits, including a Clean Water Act permit, which the Army Corps of Engineers denied. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:27 pm by Keith Garner
Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) CWA delineation procedures and guidance materials to determine if an area meets the wetland definition, with slight modifications. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:27 pm by Keith Garner
Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) CWA delineation procedures and guidance materials to determine if an area meets the wetland definition, with slight modifications. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am by Mark Walsh
’s opinion announcement in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]