Search for: "US v. Brown" Results 461 - 480 of 7,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Legal Talk Network
  This led to the use of as robot, the Remotec Androx Mark V A-1, manufactured by Northrup Grumman and a pound of C-4 explosive, which was sent in eventually killing the sniper. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 6:25 am
" (Cause apparently the steakhouse could use some help.)For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:39 am by Ellena Erskine
The justices will hear oral argument in Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Just ran across this abbreviation for the first time in a court case; it's used in New York court citations, when the name of the county is included, and it means Bronx County, e.g., "See People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Orion was used by virtually all Fortune 500 companies and many US government agencies. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Orion was used by virtually all Fortune 500 companies and many US government agencies. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm by Dan Bushell
  That was likely attributable to the the historical bond between class actions and civil rights actions -- Brown v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:27 am
  That doesn't change circuit precedent, which requires us to abstain.So that's what we're going to do.So I know your claim is that the state has taken unconstitutionally long to prosecute you. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
However after that ruling was over turned in the 1954 ruling of Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
We watch a Court willing to allow the internment of Japanese citizens during World War II evolve into the champion of civil rights that outlawed racial segregation in schools in Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 10:29 am by Harbir Deol
The post US Supreme Court Reaffirms That Being Highly Paid Does Not Make an Employee ‘Exempt’ appeared first on Brown Rudnick. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
He also says that "The public, the legal academy, our colleagues on other courts, and appointing authorities have a right to judge us based on our performance on the bench," and goes on to say: "In this case, in particular, I believe that public disclosure is important. [read post]