Search for: "US v. Cox" Results 461 - 480 of 876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
In such cases the owner is liable for failing to provide a safe place for the use of the invitee.Thus, in Brody v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:21 am by Yaaser Vanderman
The Supreme Court recently delivered judgment in the case of Patmalniece (FC) v SoS for Work and Pensions. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
Macedo's book, The Corporate Insider's Guide to US Patent Practice, which he will soon be reviewing for the PatLit weblog. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
 Thus, in Cox v Turkey  (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
(Ars Technica) Battle between software patents and open source (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Jury finds in favour of Limelight on ongoing battle with Level 3 Communication over patents covering internet content delivery network technology (Law360) USPTO overturns patent for virtual subdomains filed by Ideaflood (Ars Technica)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Bilski petitions the Supreme… [read post]