Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 461 - 480
of 9,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
[v] Cedar Point v. [read post]
New EBA referral: When is prior use of a product excluded from the prior art for lack of enablement?
30 Jun 2023, 12:57 am
Importantly, the enablement test permits the skilled person to use common general knowledge but not prior art documents that do not form part of the CGK.The referring Board of Appeal also identified diverging decisions on the appropriate criteria for assessing the ability of a skilled person to analyse and reproduce the disclosed product, particularly over the level of analysis required and the degree of variability permitted in reproduction (as discussed in Takeda v… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 11:55 am
Kindley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
Failing to receive a prompt response, Geldon added “[v]ery telling that you don’t even respond to text messages now that you don’t need help getting confirmed. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am
However, Moore v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
Waterkotte: Provisional injunctions under unfair competition law The Higher Regional Court of Hamburg addressed the delimitation between Art. 7(1) and (2) of the Brussels Ibis Regulation after Wikingerhof v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
It is also uncontested that general guidance for producing the claimed ethylene olefin copolymer is provided in paragraphs 81 to 93 of the patent in suit, including a description of the amount of catalyst and co-catalyst to be used (see paragraphs 86 and 87 of the patent in suit).2.2 The respondent pointed out in section 51 of their rejoinder that the disputed patent describes several synthesis examples providing a detailed description of catalysts and reaction conditions used for… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:18 pm
See Kanter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
Contractors can also use DCAA’s published audit guidance to identify and respond to aggressive audit positions that may be inconsistent with DCAA’s official policies, procedures, and interpretations. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:56 pm
Yesterday the Court reversed in Mallory v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
Thus, rather than using “neutrality” as an indicator of good history, historians use factors such as credibility, thoroughness, and care. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award totaling $20,944,200 for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA.[46] As the Supreme Court observed, “[e]xtraordinary grants of regulatory authority are rarely accomplished through ‘modest words,’ ‘vague terms,’ or ‘subtle device[s]’” and that Congress does not “typically use oblique or elliptical language to empower an agency to make a ‘radical or fundamental change’ to a statutory sche [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in Moore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
” People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
Texas does not cohere on many levels. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
Defendant appealed, and the Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:14 pm
This precedent fails on so many levels. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Using such terms to refer to one's commercial choices does not create a First Amendment right to contract, or not to contract. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Standards provide an intermediate level of constraint. [read post]
