Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm
Through it all, Justice Stephen Breyer persisted in making the case that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment and “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
”) Justice Stephen G. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
Mark Walsh provides a “view” from the courtroom for this blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
The Supreme Court overturned a lower trial court which said that if race were used without violating any other redistricting rules, that use was valid. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Unlike the dilution statute, the infringement statutes require proof that the accused infringer’s use of the mark is likely to cause confusion, but they do not explicitly require “commercial use” of the mark for trademark protection or infringement. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the “stay order raises a big question mark for those who think Court will use the case to rein in partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
For example, the Government does not dispute that respondent seeks to use his mark in a positive way. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
I Marks misleading the public on the paternity of copyright works are fraudulent - say French Supreme Court I Should the court be indifferent to consumer indifference regarding the mark? [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
Regulating rishvat in early colonial India”· Elizabeth Lhost, University of Chicago, “Philatelic Fraud and the Materiality of Law: Policing stamped paper in British India”· Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Corruption and Forensic Experts in late colonial India· Simanti Dasgupta, University of… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
”, Guest Kat Stephen Jones shares his insights on Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:32 am
” Briefly: At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse, Stephen Bainbridge discusses Kokesh v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Stephen Sachs maintains that the court’s opinion in personal-jurisdiction case BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
In Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Oh, you can’t use the word Muslim. [read post]
22 May 2017, 2:55 pm
The new decision, in the case of Cooper v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am
Mark Walsh has a summary of the festivities. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:15 am
Ransom v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Hawaii v. [read post]
