Search for: "US v. PARIS" Results 461 - 480 of 1,587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2019, 7:05 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Paris The Decision to Withdraw in Children With Ventricular Assist DevicesDanton Char & Seth A. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media In the case of UFC-Que Choisir v Google (Judgment in French) the TGI Paris has ruled that 38 of the clauses in Google’s “Terms of use” and “Confidentiality Policy” were unfair and hence null and void. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm
Last month, it was the terms and conditions of Google that were subjected to judicial scrutiny, in a decision handed by the same Tribunal on 12 February 2019 (decision: Paris Tribunal (Tribunal de Grande Instance), UFC-Que Choisir v Google Inc (12 February 2019), see here for the decision in French). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Take the example of carriage taxes at issue in the 1796 Supreme Court case of Hylton v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 8:55 am
CopyrightThe 1709 Blog reports on the US Supreme Court decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:37 pm
Has published over 80 articles in professional journals and has co-authored several books published in Cuba and abroad, among them those published with Harvard University, Columbia University, New York University, Sorbonne University Paris 3, Institute of Development Economics (IDE-JETRO) in Japan, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and the Universidad de la Habana. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
We’ll pass the bill first, and let the courts tell us later whether it violates the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
Never Too Late 208 [Week ending 9 Dec] Commercial use of image rights: Paris Tribunal boosts models and performers’ protection | General rules on direct and indirect liability for copyright infringement instead of Art. 13 | Double trouble: fresh CJEU reference from Swedish Supreme Court regarding scope of communication to the public inside cars | BREAKING NEWS: The first Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List has been published! [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Never Too Late 208 [Week ending 9 Dec] Commercial use of image rights: Paris Tribunal boosts models and performers’ protection | General rules on direct and indirect liability for copyright infringement instead of Art. 13 | Double trouble: fresh CJEU reference from Swedish Supreme Court regarding scope of communication to the public inside cars | BREAKING NEWS: The first Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List has been published! [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
A year ago in this blog, I addressed York University’s appeal of the federal court’s decision against its clams to “fair dealing” in its instructors’ reproduction of course materials in Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (CCLA) v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
In its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 considered in the contested decision and resubmitted those requests as main request and auxiliary requests I to V. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
 Kat Eleonora reminded us of the New joint IPKat/BLACA event! [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In or around 1998, Alice and Michael Kimble opened a bank account at HSBC (“HSBC account”) in Paris, France to pay expenses associated with a Paris apartment they owned. [read post]